| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
23/11/2000 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
20/10/2022 |
|
Autoria: |
RODRIGUES, T. E.; PALMIERI, F.; CAMARGO, M. N.; JACOMINE, P. K. T.; LARACH, J. O. I.; SANTOS, R. D. dos; SILVA, J. M. L. da; SANTOS, P. L. dos; BARRETO, W. de O.; DURIEZ, M. A. de M.; JOHAS, R. A. L.; ARAUJO, W. S. de; FONTES, L. E. F.; ANTONELLO, L. L.; LIMA, T. da C.; RODRIGUES, E. M. |
|
Título: |
Estudo expedito de solos do Território Federal de Rondônia para fins de classificação, correlação e legenda preliminar. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1980 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Rio de Janeiro: EMBRAPA-SNLCS, 1980. |
|
Páginas: |
145 p. |
|
Descrição Física: |
il. |
|
Série: |
(EMBRAPA-SNLCS. Boletim técnico, 73). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Programa e roteiro da viagem de correlacao de solos. Exame dos solos, amostragens e metodos de analises. Sequencia e discussao sucinta dos estudos realizados. Predominancia de classes de solos nos diversos trechos percorridos. Legenda preliminar de identificacao dos solos. Proposicao, tentativa de conceituacao de plintossolos e criterios distintivos. Comparacao distintiva com outros solos. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Rondonia. |
|
Thesagro: |
Classificação do Solo; Reconhecimento do Solo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Amazonia; soil classification; soil surveys. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01554nam a2200397 a 4500
001 1389066
005 2022-10-20
008 1980 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
100 1 $aRODRIGUES, T. E.
245 $aEstudo expedito de solos do Território Federal de Rondônia para fins de classificação, correlação e legenda preliminar.
260 $aRio de Janeiro: EMBRAPA-SNLCS$c1980
300 $a145 p.$cil.
490 $a(EMBRAPA-SNLCS. Boletim técnico, 73).
520 $aPrograma e roteiro da viagem de correlacao de solos. Exame dos solos, amostragens e metodos de analises. Sequencia e discussao sucinta dos estudos realizados. Predominancia de classes de solos nos diversos trechos percorridos. Legenda preliminar de identificacao dos solos. Proposicao, tentativa de conceituacao de plintossolos e criterios distintivos. Comparacao distintiva com outros solos.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $asoil classification
650 $asoil surveys
650 $aClassificação do Solo
650 $aReconhecimento do Solo
653 $aBrasil
653 $aRondonia
700 1 $aPALMIERI, F.
700 1 $aCAMARGO, M. N.
700 1 $aJACOMINE, P. K. T.
700 1 $aLARACH, J. O. I.
700 1 $aSANTOS, R. D. dos
700 1 $aSILVA, J. M. L. da
700 1 $aSANTOS, P. L. dos
700 1 $aBARRETO, W. de O.
700 1 $aDURIEZ, M. A. de M.
700 1 $aJOHAS, R. A. L.
700 1 $aARAUJO, W. S. de
700 1 $aFONTES, L. E. F.
700 1 $aANTONELLO, L. L.
700 1 $aLIMA, T. da C.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, E. M.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpma.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
01/03/2024 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
01/03/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
NUNES, P. S. de O.; JÚNIOR, G. V. L.; MASCARIN, G. M.; GUIMARÃES, R. A.; MEDEIROS, F. H. V. de; ARTHURS, S.; BETTIOL, W. |
|
Afiliação: |
PETERSON SYLVIO DE OLIVEIRA NUNES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; GILENO VIEIRA LACERDA JÚNIOR; GABRIEL MOURA MASCARIN, CNPMA; RAFAELA ARAUJO GUIMARÃES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; FLÁVIO HENRIQUE VASCONCELOS DE MEDEIROS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; STEVEN ARTHURS, BIOBEE USA; WAGNER BETTIOL, CNPMA. |
|
Título: |
Microbial consortia of biological products: do they have a future? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2024 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Biological Control, v. 188, article 105439, 2024. |
|
ISSN: |
1049-9644 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105439 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: Beneficial microbes play crucial role in modern agriculture, serving as biopesticides, biostimulants/biofertilizers, and alleviating abiotic stress in crops. Their multifaceted functions contribute significantly to crop health and sustainability, aligning with the principles of regenerative agriculture by minimizing carbon footprints and reducing dependence on agrichemical inputs. The concept of ‘microbial consortia’, involving the combination of multiple fungal and bacterial species or strains, has gained recognition for its potential advantages over single species/strains applications. This method aims to employ a spectrum of ecological functions, encouraging biological equilibrium within agricultural systems. Recent research highlights how microbial consortia can directly and indirectly enhance plant health, through various mechanisms and interactions with their host plants. This review presents examples demonstrating the efficacy of microbial consortia as biopesticides and biostimulants/biofertilizers. These consortia exhibit potential in managing plant diseases and pests, while also promoting plant growth and mitigating specific abiotic and biotic stresses in crops. This review examines real-world examples considering instances of success and failure, discusses methodologies employed for evaluating interactions, and also addresses challenges in the selection, production, and application of optimal microbial consortia for agricultural use providing valuable insights in the current and future prospects of microbial consortia in modern agriculture. MenosAbstract: Beneficial microbes play crucial role in modern agriculture, serving as biopesticides, biostimulants/biofertilizers, and alleviating abiotic stress in crops. Their multifaceted functions contribute significantly to crop health and sustainability, aligning with the principles of regenerative agriculture by minimizing carbon footprints and reducing dependence on agrichemical inputs. The concept of ‘microbial consortia’, involving the combination of multiple fungal and bacterial species or strains, has gained recognition for its potential advantages over single species/strains applications. This method aims to employ a spectrum of ecological functions, encouraging biological equilibrium within agricultural systems. Recent research highlights how microbial consortia can directly and indirectly enhance plant health, through various mechanisms and interactions with their host plants. This review presents examples demonstrating the efficacy of microbial consortia as biopesticides and biostimulants/biofertilizers. These consortia exhibit potential in managing plant diseases and pests, while also promoting plant growth and mitigating specific abiotic and biotic stresses in crops. This review examines real-world examples considering instances of success and failure, discusses methodologies employed for evaluating interactions, and also addresses challenges in the selection, production, and application of optimal microbial consortia for agricultural use providing valuable ins... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bioinputs; Microbial revolution; Synthetic microbiomes. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura Sustentável; Controle Biológico. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biofertilizers; Biological control; Biological control agents; Biopesticides. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
H Saúde e Patologia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02563naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2162455
005 2024-03-01
008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1049-9644
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105439$2DOI
100 1 $aNUNES, P. S. de O.
245 $aMicrobial consortia of biological products$bdo they have a future?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2024
520 $aAbstract: Beneficial microbes play crucial role in modern agriculture, serving as biopesticides, biostimulants/biofertilizers, and alleviating abiotic stress in crops. Their multifaceted functions contribute significantly to crop health and sustainability, aligning with the principles of regenerative agriculture by minimizing carbon footprints and reducing dependence on agrichemical inputs. The concept of ‘microbial consortia’, involving the combination of multiple fungal and bacterial species or strains, has gained recognition for its potential advantages over single species/strains applications. This method aims to employ a spectrum of ecological functions, encouraging biological equilibrium within agricultural systems. Recent research highlights how microbial consortia can directly and indirectly enhance plant health, through various mechanisms and interactions with their host plants. This review presents examples demonstrating the efficacy of microbial consortia as biopesticides and biostimulants/biofertilizers. These consortia exhibit potential in managing plant diseases and pests, while also promoting plant growth and mitigating specific abiotic and biotic stresses in crops. This review examines real-world examples considering instances of success and failure, discusses methodologies employed for evaluating interactions, and also addresses challenges in the selection, production, and application of optimal microbial consortia for agricultural use providing valuable insights in the current and future prospects of microbial consortia in modern agriculture.
650 $aBiofertilizers
650 $aBiological control
650 $aBiological control agents
650 $aBiopesticides
650 $aAgricultura Sustentável
650 $aControle Biológico
653 $aBioinputs
653 $aMicrobial revolution
653 $aSynthetic microbiomes
700 1 $aJÚNIOR, G. V. L.
700 1 $aMASCARIN, G. M.
700 1 $aGUIMARÃES, R. A.
700 1 $aMEDEIROS, F. H. V. de
700 1 $aARTHURS, S.
700 1 $aBETTIOL, W.
773 $tBiological Control$gv. 188, article 105439, 2024.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| 1. |  | 1100067, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society and Farm Management Society, Ottawa-Canada
Biblioteca(s): Catálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Suínos e Aves; Embrapa Trigo; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |   |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
